Ophthalmology · clinical quick reference

Outpatient management after penetrating keratoplasty

A practical, condensed version of the methodological recommendations: graft assessment, immunologic risk stratification, follow-up schedule, exact treatment regimens, and management of complications.

For ophthalmologists and residents Rapid clinical decision support 15 figures · 21 clinical photographs
Clinical photograph of a penetrating corneal graft
Low riskFirst examination 1 week after discharge

If the course is stable, visit frequency is gradually reduced.

High riskAfter 3–4 days, then every 3–7 days

During the first month, examination every other day may be required; keep a low threshold for referral.

Acute deteriorationRedness, photophobia, pain, reduced vision

Do not wait for the scheduled visit: exclude rejection, infection, and wound/suture failure.

Contents

Key points#

This quick reference answers three practical questions: how high the risk of graft disease is, how often the patient should be examined, and what to do at the first signs of an adverse course.

Principle 1Risk determines follow-up intensity

Vascularization, repeat PK, active infectious inflammation, severe dry eye, and systemic disease place the patient in the high-risk group.

Principle 2Assess the same core findings at every visit

Visual acuity, graft clarity and epithelialization, suture status, keratic precipitates/edema, inflammation, new vessels, and IOP.

Principle 3Taper topical corticosteroids slowly

Abrupt unsupervised discontinuation may trigger graft rejection. In high-risk eyes, maintenance treatment may be prolonged or lifelong.

Principle 4Deterioration requires an immediate decision

Redness, photophobia, pain, blurred or reduced vision require urgent slit-lamp examination and escalation—not waiting for scheduled follow-up.

!
Critical error

Do not “observe over time” suspected rejection, infection, wound/suture failure, or graft melt without urgent corneal surgeon review.

What to assess at every visit#

Use a reproducible minimum examination set to detect subtle changes before irreversible graft opacity develops.

Function

Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity; ask about blur, halos, photophobia, and pain.

Graft

Clarity, completeness of epithelialization, stromal edema, Descemet membrane folds, keratic precipitates, and focal infiltrates.

Suture and wound

Tension or loosening, exposed suture, erosion, infiltrate, vessel ingrowth; perform a Seidel test if leakage is suspected.

Inflammation and infection

Injection pattern, anterior chamber cells/flare, hypopyon, discharge, and epithelial defects.

Intraocular pressure

Check at every visit. After PK, non-contact tonometry may be unreliable; the source document proposes transpalpebral tonometry or comparative digital palpation.

Additional tests

Keratometry/topography at approximately month 3; after suture removal, repeat refraction and topography in 2–4 weeks.

Figure 1Clear graft 7 days after surgery. The continuous suture is clean and intact.

Uncomplicated course: epithelialization is usually complete by days 7–10; edema gradually decreases over 1–2 months. By month 6, the expected findings are a quiet eye, clear graft, clean intact suture, and no significant vascular invasion.

Immunologic risk stratification#

Low risk

Favorable recipient bed and first elective optical graft.

  • First PK.
  • Avascular cornea or only minimal superficial vascularization.
  • No active inflammation.
  • Typical indications: keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, limited stromal opacities.
  • No severe systemic autoimmune disease.

High risk

Corneal immune privilege is disrupted or healing is substantially impaired.

  • Corneal vascularization; involvement of ≥2 quadrants indicates very high risk.
  • Repeat keratoplasty.
  • Urgent PK for ulceration, perforation, or melt.
  • Severe dry eye, Sjögren syndrome, or ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.
  • Autoimmune disease, systemic vasculitis, or Stevens–Johnson syndrome.
  • Combined surgery, pediatric age, or poor-quality donor tissue.
Figure 2High-risk PK candidate: vascularization in all 4 quadrants and an optical-zone defect threatening perforation.
!
High risk requires a low threshold for referral

A new vessel reaching the graft, increasing opacity, edema, thinning, or marked inflammation → urgent corneal surgeon review.

Follow-up schedule#

Low risk#

  1. 1 week after discharge

    Approximately 2–3 weeks after surgery: visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, tonometry, suture assessment, and adherence review.

  2. First month

    Examine every 2 weeks.

  3. Months 2–6

    Approximately monthly; by month 3, perform keratometry or topography if epithelialization is complete.

  4. Months 6–12

    Every 1.5–2 months, or at least once per quarter.

  5. After year 1

    During year 2, every 3–6 months; thereafter annually for life.

Sutures: with a favorable course, sutures are generally left untouched for at least 12 months. Removal is usually considered at 12–15 months, individualized by clarity, vascularization, and wound strength.

Figure 3A,BA — loose continuous suture with superficial vessels growing toward the graft; B — infiltrate adjacent to the loose suture with neovascularization.

High risk#

  1. 3–4 days after discharge

    First outpatient review.

  2. First month

    Every 3–7 days; if unstable, every other day during the first 2 weeks.

  3. Months 2–6

    Every 2 weeks, at least twice monthly.

  4. Months 6–12

    Monthly.

  5. Year 2 and beyond

    At least every 2 months during year 2; thereafter quarterly for life.

Escalation and referral

In high-risk eyes, rejection, marked inflammation, a new vessel, thinning, or melt should not be managed for a prolonged period in outpatient care alone—refer to a specialist center.

Baseline treatment: low risk#

The doses and intervals below are retained from the methodological recommendations. Adjust treatment according to the operating surgeon’s discharge instructions and clinical course.

Scroll horizontally to view the table
Medication / regimenMonths 1–2Months 3–4Months 5–6Months 7–8Months 9–10Months 11–12
Antibiotic1 drop × 4 times/day**
ONLY 7–10 DAYS
Corticosteroid
(dexamethasone 0.1%)
1 drop × 6 times/day1 drop × 5 times/day1 drop × 4 times/day1 drop × 3 times/day1 drop × 2 times/day1 drop once daily (morning)
Corneal surface protective agent1 drop × 3 times/day1 drop × 2 times/day
Lubricant1 drop × 4–8 times/dayAs needed; preservative-free preferred

* drops × times per day; ** course ONLY 7–10 DAYS.

i
The source document provides two early dexamethasone regimens

Table regimen: dexamethasone 0.1%, 1 drop 6 times daily during months 1–2. Narrative regimen: every 2 hours while awake or 6–8 times/day. Do not independently average these regimens; follow the surgeon’s discharge instructions and graft status.

Antibacterial prophylaxis

Agents
Ciprofloxacin 0.3%, ofloxacin 0.3%, levofloxacin 0.5%, or tobramycin 0.3%.
Regimen
4–6 times daily. Course: ONLY 7–10 DAYS.
Discontinue
After epithelialization if there are no signs of infection.

Lubrication

Regimen
4–8 times daily as needed.
Preferred
Preservative-free products.
Goal
Support epithelialization and treat postoperative dry eye.

Mydriatics / cycloplegics

Agents
Tropicamide 1% or cyclopentolate 1%.
Regimen
1–2 times daily during the first 1–2 weeks — USE WITH EXTREME CAUTION AND ONLY ON THE OPERATING SURGEON’S RECOMMENDATION.
Monitoring
IOP monitoring is mandatory; consider the risk of Urrets–Zavalia syndrome. Use only on the operating surgeon’s recommendation.

EXTREME CAUTION: only on the operating surgeon’s recommendation.

IOP-lowering treatment

First line
Timolol 0.5% twice daily or dorzolamide 2% 2–3 times daily.
Caution
Prostaglandin analogues are generally avoided during the first months.
Approach
Do not automatically stop corticosteroids: balance the risks of ocular hypertension and graft rejection.

Treatment when indicated#

  • Herpetic etiology: valacyclovir 1000 mg orally 3 times daily for 10 days, or famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily. Topical option: acyclovir 3% ointment at night.
  • Topical NSAIDs: diclofenac 0.1% or bromfenac 0.05% once daily during the first weeks. Not mandatory; use cautiously because of delayed epithelialization and epithelial erosion.
  • Systemic corticosteroids: not routinely required. In some centers, prednisolone approximately 20–30 mg with tapering over 2–3 weeks.

Treatment: high risk#

Intensive topical corticosteroids

Dexamethasone 0.1% hourly for at least 2 weeks → 6 times/day by month 2 → 4 times/day by month 3 → 2–4 times/day through month 6 and beyond.

Long-term maintenance

Do not discontinue completely during the first 1–2 years; lifelong once-daily maintenance may be required.

Cyclosporine A 0.05%

In selected cases: 1 drop twice daily for at least 6–12 months, often up to 2 years; only when prescribed by the surgeon and etiologically appropriate.

Ocular surface support

Lubricants every 1–2 hours, gels/ointments at night; consider punctal plugs or partial tarsorrhaphy when indicated.

Progressive vascularization

Consult a corneal transplant center; local anti-VEGF therapy is an individualized option based on multidisciplinary review.

!
Infectious-disease caution

If fungal infection is possible or bacterial susceptibility data are unavailable, do not introduce topical corticosteroids or cyclosporine A until the pathogen is clarified and adequate antimicrobial control is established.

Figure 4Secondary infection after partial PK: keratouveitis, 0.5-mm hypopyon, mixed injection.
Figure 5Corneal infiltrate with mixed-etiology keratouveitis; a clinical setting in which therapeutic (urgent) PK may be required to preserve the globe.

Refractory rejection: prednisolone 1 mg/kg orally + cyclosporine A 5 mg/kg orally if not contraindicated; alternatively tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil—only under specialist supervision.

Acute deterioration: differential management#

First identify the dominant syndrome: immune rejection, infection, mechanical failure, epithelial defect, or graft melt. Then begin permissible initial measures and urgently escalate care.

Scroll horizontally to view the table
SituationKey findingsInitial actionEscalation and referral
RejectionReduced vision, redness, photophobia; edema, Descemet membrane folds, keratic precipitates, Khodadoust line.Dexamethasone 0.1% hourly; every ~2 hours overnight.Urgent referral to a specialist center / hospital.
Suture-related keratitisFocal infiltrate and erosion around the suture, discharge, progressive ulceration.Intensive topical fluoroquinolone therapy; temporarily stop corticosteroids until infection is controlled.Urgent review; remove/replace the suture if the infiltrate fails to resolve within 2–3 days.
Suture / wound failurePositive Seidel test, shallow anterior chamber, wound deformation, history of trauma.Bandage contact lens, sterile eye dressing, supine face-up position, frequent antibacterial drops.Immediate transfer for resuturing.
Persistent epithelial defectFluorescein-staining defect, pain, absent epithelialization, filaments.Frequent lubricants, carbomer at night, therapeutic soft contact lens; temporarily hold corticosteroids for a significant defect.If persistent for >2 weeks, investigate dry eye, infection, and mechanical causes.
Graft meltProgressive thinning, graft deformation, impending or established perforation.Stop corticosteroids and initiate intensive corneal surface protective therapy.Urgently consider autoconjunctival corneal coverage, blepharorrhaphy, or repeat large-diameter keratoplasty.

Graft rejection#

TopicalDexamethasone 0.1% hourly; every ~2 hours overnight
Hospital treatmentDexamethasone 16 mg IV or prednisolone 60–80 mg/day with gradual taper
Figure 6A,BA — 9.0-mm graft with the suture involving the limbus; B — punctate endothelial precipitates forming a Khodadoust line.
Figure 7A,BSeven days after removal of a loose suture and escalation of topical corticosteroids following an episode of graft disease.

Suture failure or wound dehiscence#

!
Emergency

Bandage contact lens + sterile dressing + supine face-up position + frequent antibacterial drops → immediate transfer for resuturing.

Figure 8Wound dehiscence from 11 to 3 o’clock after trauma, one week after suture removal at 16 months after PK.

Suture-related keratitis and infection#

  • Antibiotic: intensive topical fluoroquinolone therapy.
  • Suture: if the infiltrate does not resolve within 2–3 days, remove or replace the infected suture.
  • Corticosteroids: temporarily discontinue until infection is controlled.
Figure 9Suture-related keratitis and thinning: OCT thickness 120 µm, with infiltration at the edge of the thinned area.

Persistent epithelial defect#

  • Frequent artificial tears; carbomer at night.
  • Therapeutic soft contact lens.
  • Consider autologous serum tears.
  • For a significant defect, temporarily hold corticosteroids until epithelialization.
  • If the defect persists for more than 2 weeks → investigate dry eye, infection, and mechanical causes.
Figure 10A,BPersistent epithelial defect; fluorescein staining.
Figure 11A,BFilamentary epithelial defects 6 months after PK; fluorescein staining.

Graft thinning and melt#

!
Threat to globe integrity

Stop corticosteroids, initiate intensive corneal surface protective therapy, and urgently consider autoconjunctival corneal coverage, blepharorrhaphy, or repeat large-diameter keratoplasty.

Figure 12Critical graft thinning at 3 months requiring autoconjunctival coverage.
Figure 13Area of thinning in the optical portion of the graft.

Late follow-up and additional procedures#

Scroll horizontally to view the table
Clinical taskPractical approachApproximate timing
Suture removalIndividualize according to clarity, vascularization, suture type, and wound strength. Repeat refraction/topography after removal.Usually 12–15 months; review 2–4 weeks after removal.
Post-keratoplasty astigmatismSpectacle correction; rigid gas-permeable lenses if the epithelium is stable. Excimer laser correction only with a stable graft.RGP lenses after 3–4 months; laser correction no earlier than 2 years.
CataractPerform phacoemulsification + IOL under protective corticosteroid therapy.Preferably 1–2 years after PK.
Refractory glaucomaLaser/surgical treatment when indicated, accounting for the risk of triggering rejection.If possible, after graft healing—6–12 months.
Repeat optical PKCompletely control inflammation and minimize vascularization; decide jointly with the corneal surgeon.No earlier than 6–12 months after the first graft.
Figure 14Mature cataract after 2 years of topical corticosteroid therapy; status after elective phacoemulsification + IOL.
Figure 15A,BA — marked stromal vascularization in 4 quadrants before repeat keratoplasty; B — melt, perforation, and iris plugging.

Critical errors#

  • Abruptly stop topical corticosteroids or allow the patient to change dosing frequency independently.
  • Use corticosteroids or cyclosporine A when fungal infection is possible or antimicrobial control is inadequate.
  • Ignore a new vessel, focal infiltrate near a suture, or subtle reduction in graft clarity.
  • Rely solely on non-contact tonometry after PK without correlating it with clinical findings and an alternative IOP assessment.
  • Continue prolonged outpatient treatment of suspected rejection, wound failure, or melt without urgent escalation.
  • Plan refractive or repeat surgery before the graft is stable and inflammation is controlled.

Prepared by#

Matvey Yuryevich Shemyakin

Clinical editing and digital adaptation

Matvey Yu. Shemyakin

Ophthalmologist, Ophthalmology Department No. 63 · Junior Research Fellow, S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center

Prepared for rapid professional use by ophthalmologists and residents, based on methodological recommendations for outpatient management of patients with a full-thickness corneal graft.

References#

The primary source is the authors’ methodological recommendation; the bibliography is retained in a concise clinical format.

  1. Arzhimatova GSh, Salikhov EA, Chernakova GM, Shemyakin MY. Algorithms for management of patients with a full-thickness corneal graft in Moscow public healthcare organizations during outpatient care. Methodological recommendations. Moscow: Moscow City Ophthalmology Center, S.P. Botkin Center; 2025.
  2. Eye Bank Association of America. Eye Banking Statistical Report — 2024.
  3. Eye Bank Association of America. 2018 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Washington, DC: EBAA; 2019.
  4. Arzhimatova GSh, Salikhov EA, Shemyakin MY. Corneal neovascularization: current view of molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2023;16(2):153–159. doi:10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-153-159.
  5. Sarezky D, Orlin SE, Pan W, VanderBeek BL. Trends in Corneal Transplantation in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2017;36(2):131–137. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001083.
  6. Boisjoly HM, Tourigny R, Bazin R, et al. Risk factors of corneal graft failure. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(11):1728–1735. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(93)31409-0.
  7. Sugar A, Tanner JP, Dontchev M, et al. Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(6):1023–1028. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.050.
  8. Lois N, Kowal VO, Cohen EJ, et al. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1989–1995. Cornea. 1997;16(6):623–629.
  9. Gurnani B, et al. Corneal Graft Rejection. StatPearls. 2023. NCBI Bookshelf: NBK519043.
  10. Magovern M, et al. Trends in keratoplasty for keratoconus: a report by the Eye Bank Association of America. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1471–1478.
  11. Sharif W, et al. Corneal graft rejection: incidence, features, risk factors, and outcomes. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019;13:1343–1355.
  12. Gurnani B, et al. Penetrating Keratoplasty. StatPearls. 2023. NCBI Bookshelf: NBK592388.
  13. Arzhimatova GSh, Chernakova GM, Salikhov EA, Shemyakin MY. Statistical analysis of risk factors for penetrating corneal graft disease in high-risk keratoplasty. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2024;21(3):509–516. doi:10.18008/1816-5095-2024-3-509-516.
  14. Slonimskiy YuB, Arzhimatova GSh, Slonimskiy AYu, Salikhov EA, Slonimskaya AS. Penetrating corneal graft survival: analysis of clinical cases. The EYE GLAZ. 2025;27(3):222–230. doi:10.33791/2222-4408-2025-3-222-230.
  15. Kalinnikov YuYu, Izmailova SB, Ragimova LF, et al. Clinical and functional results of combined surgical treatment of keratoconus: 10-year follow-up. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(1):191–199. doi:10.18008/1816-5095-2025-1-191-199.
Purpose of this materialThis quick reference is intended for rapid professional orientation and selection of a management pathway. It does not replace the operating surgeon’s individualized decision, discharge instructions, or in-person assessment.